RUPE ET AL., TRUSTEES, ET AL.

v.

WALLACE ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (44 total)

• Am. Express Warehousing, Ltd. v. Transamerica Ins. Co., 380 F.2d 277 (2d Cir. 1967)
  …385. Unlike the case of a trade se-. cret, erroneous disclosure of work-product does not make almost certain the immediate destruction of a protected property right,9 cf. Covey Oil Co. v. Continental Oil Co., 340 F. 2d 993 (10th Cir.), cert. denied 380 U.S. 964, 85 S.Ct. 1110, 14 L.Ed.2d 155 (1965) (appellants not parties to litigation). The interest protected is not only qualified but intangible and difficult to relate to immediate harm. Moreover, there can be appellate review of the order below even wit…
• Republic Gear Co. v. Borg-Warner Corp., 381 F.2d 551 (2d Cir. 1967)
  …0 S.Ct. 540, 84 L.Ed. 783 (1940); National Nut Co. of California v. Kelling Nut Co., 134 F. 2d 532 (7 Cir. 1943); Korman v. Shull, 310 F. 2d 373 (6 Cir. 1962); but also see Covey Oil Co. v. Continental Oil Co., 340 F. 2d 993 (10 Cir.), cert, denied, 380 U.S. 964, 85 S.Ct. 1110, 14 L.Ed.2d 155 (1965). In the latter situation where disclosure is ordered and the order is not complied with, appellate review in subsequent contempt proceedings, however risky, see Horvath v. Letay, supra, 343 F. 2d at 464; Covey…
• Heat & Control, Inc. v. Hester Indus., Inc., 785 F.2d 1017 (Fed. Cir. 1986)
  …, 740 F. 2d 556, 563 (7th Cir.1984); Dart Industries Co. v. Westwood Chemical Co., 649 F. 2d 646, 648 (9th Cir.1980), citing Premium Service Corp., 511 F. 2d at 229; Covey Oil Co. v. Continental Oil Co., 340 F. 2d 993, 999 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 380 U.S. 964, 85 S.Ct. 1110, 14 L.Ed.2d 155 (1965); Ariel, 693 F. 2d at 1060. An abuse of discretion occurs when (1) the court’s decision is “clearly unreasonable, arbitrary or fanciful” (Northrop Corp., 751 F. 2d at 399); (2) the decision is based on an errone…

  ← 1 / 2 →