GIANNAKOUROS ET AL.

v.

ORIENTAL TANKER CORP., S. A., ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (19 total)

• In re the Complaint of William McLINN v. The F/V Fjord, 739 F.2d 1395 (9th Cir. 1984)
  …v. Mississippi Valley Generating Co., 364 U.S. 520, 526, 81 S.Ct. 294, 297, 5 L.Ed.2d 268 (1961); United States v. Rosales, 584 F. 2d 870, 872 (9th Cir.1978); Phoenix Title and Trust Co. v. Stewart, 337 F. 2d 978, 985 (9th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 380 U.S. 979, 85 S.Ct. 1335, 14 L.Ed.2d 273 (1965). The record is not closed, and the appellate court may review all relevant legal authorities. In questions of law “we are not confined to the ‘clearly erroneous’ or some other restricted standard of review, but…
• E.G. Clayton v. Republic Airlines, Inc., 716 F.2d 729 (9th Cir. 1983)
  …diction of the CAB and dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. ANALYSIS: We review de novo orders dismissing for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Phoenix Title & Trust Co. v. Stewart, 337 F. 2d 978, 985 (9th Cir.1964), cert. denied, 380 U.S. 979, 85 S.Ct. 1335, 14 L.Ed.2d 273 (1964). A district court has jurisdiction over a case brought under the Railway Labor Act claiming a breach of the duty of fair representation. Vaca v. Sipes, 386 U.S. 171, 87 S.Ct. 903, 17 L.Ed.2d 842 (1967); Steele…
• Autowest, Inc. v. Peugeot, Inc., 434 F.2d 556 (2d Cir. 1970)
  …ed in the context of “coercion, intimidation, or threats,” and a causal connection between the dealer’s resistance to the coercive conduct and the termination is required. E. g., Kotula v. Ford Motor Co., 338 F. 2d 732 (8th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 380 U.S. 979, 85 S.Ct. 1333, 14 L.Ed.2d 273 (1965); H.R.Rep. No. 2850, 84th Cong., 2d Sess. (1956), 3 U.S.Code Cong. & Admin.News, 1956, p. 4603. But more is required than coercion and subsequent termination for failure to submit, for otherwise the manufacturer…

  ← 1 / 2 →