GREEN

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Gurleski v. United States, 405 F.2d 253 (5th Cir. 1968)
  …lete control; (4) the search did not extend to the defendant’s “personal effects” and (5) there was nothing “unfair, unreasonable or oppressive” about the search and seizure. Cf. Roberts v. United States, 332 F. 2d 892, 897 (8 Cir. 1964), cert. den. 380 U.S. 980, 85 S.Ct. 1344, 14 L.Ed. 2d 274. These factors are all present in the instant case, and we hold that the search was reasonable and the evidence admissible under all the circumstances. We subscribe .to the view that “where two persons have equal righ…
• Pugliese v. United States, 353 F.2d 514 (1st Cir. 1965)
  …sentence. Such uncertainties are inherent in any “on and after sentence,” due to the possibilities of good time, etc., yet such sentences have never been considered illegal as such. See Green v. United States, 1 Cir., 1964, 334 F. 2d 733, cert. den. 380 U.S. 980, 85 S.Ct. 1345, 14 L.Ed.2d 274. The voiding of a prior sentence does not affect the validity of a subsequent sentence, but only the commencement date. Blitz v. United States, 1894, 153 U.S. 308, 14 S.Ct. 924, 38 L.Ed. 725. In some cases it may be t…
• Beardslee v. United States, 387 F.2d 280 (8th Cir. 1967)
  …degree or manslaughter verdicts in cases which, on their general facts, are not dissimilar to this one. Arpan v. United States, supra; Roberts v. United States, 332 F. 2d 892 (8 Cir. 1964), affirming 223 F.Supp. 49, 55 (E.D.Ark. 1965), cert, denied 380 U.S. 980, 85 S.Ct. 1344, 14 L.Ed.2d 274. We hold, although with some reluctance and with full awareness of a new trial’s difficulties, expense and tribulations for all concerned, that the error in the second degree murder instruction was prejudicial to the…