BRADY

v.

OHIO

Citator

Cited By (26 total)

• Langevin v. Chenango Court, Inc., 447 F.2d 296 (2d Cir. 1971)
  …stering a contract which Congress authorized it to make. Other factors tending in the direction of nonreviewability are the managerial nature of the responsibilities confided to the FHA, cf. Ferry v. Udall, 336 F. 2d 706 (9 Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 381 U.S. 904, 85 S.Ct. 1449, 14 L.Ed.2d 286 (1965), the need for expedition to achieve the Congressional objective, which we have already discussed, and the quantity of appeals that would result if FHA authorizations to increase rents were held reviewable, see S…
• Ness Inv. Corp. v. United States Dep't OF Agric., 512 F.2d 706 (9th Cir. 1975)
  …required review. But in the past, this circuit has also taken the position that review for abuse of discretion will not be undertaken where action has been committed to agency discretion. Ferry v. Udall, 336 F. 2d 706 (9th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 381 U.S. 904, 85 S.Ct. 1449, 14 L.Ed.2d 286 (1965). In Ferry the court held that a decision of the Secretary of the Interior not to issue a cash certificate evidencing acceptance of an offer to purchase public land was not subject to review for abuse of discreti…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Local 2855 v. United States, 602 F.2d 574 (3d Cir. 1979)
  …viewability: A Functional Analysis of “Committed to Agency Discretion", 82 Harv.L.Rev. 367 (1968). Compare Berger, Administrative Arbitrariness: A Synthesis, 78 Yale L.J. 965 (1969). . Ferry v. Udall, 336 F. 2d 706, 711 (9 Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 381 U.S. 904, 85 S.Ct. 1449, 14 L.Ed.2d 286 (1965). Judicial reluctance to review agency decisions made under a grant of broad discretion has been justified by one commentator on two grounds: First, without benefit of a statutory delineation of the limits of d…