CHICAGO & NORTH WESTERN RAILWAY CO.

v.

CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL & PACIFIC RAILROAD CO. ET AL.; NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD CO. V. SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO.; FERRARIO V. SIGLER, WARDEN

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. McCASKILL, 676 F.2d 995 (4th Cir. 1982)
  …, cert. denied, 386 U.S. 982, 87 S.Ct. 1286, 18 L.Ed.2d 229; United States v. Bryant, supra, 612 F. 2d 803; United States v. Graydon, 429 F. 2d 120, 123-24 (4th Cir. 1970); United States v. Jones, 340 F. 2d 599, 600 (4th Cir. 1965), cert. dismissed, 381 U.S. 907, 85 S.Ct. 1456, 14 L.Ed.2d 430; United States v. Lawrenson, 298 F. 2d 880, 884 (4th Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 370 U.S. 947, 82 S.Ct. 1594, 8 L.Ed.2d 812; United States v. Gerald, 624 F. 2d 1291, 1300 (5th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 920, 101…
• NEW Orleans Terminal Co. & S. Pac. Co. v. Spencer, 366 F.2d 160 (5th Cir. 1966)
  …ed. Texas & P. R. Co. v. Gulf C. & S.F. R. Co., 270 U.S. 266, 278 [46 S.Ct. 263, 266, 70 L.Ed. 578].” Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad Co., 380 U.S. 448, 85 S.Ct. 1102, 14 L.Ed.2d 151, reh. den. 381 U.S. 907, 85 S.Ct. 1445, 14 L.Ed.2d 289. The district court, in the case before us, noted that the reference in the Supreme Court’s per curiam reversal was to a page of the report of the Texas & Pacific Railway case in which mention was made of an extension…
• United States v. Graydon, 429 F.2d 120 (4th Cir. 1970)
  …objects and the grounds of his objection.” United States v. Ostendorff, 371 F. 2d 729, 731 (4 Cir. 1967), cert. den., 386 U.S. 982, 87 S.Ct. 1286, 18 L.Ed.2d 229 (1967) ; accord, United States v. Jones, 340 F. 2d 599, 601 (4 Cir. 1965), cert. dis., 381 U. S. 907, 85 S.Ct. 1456, 14 L.Ed.2d 430 (1965). We are aware that this court has in the past reversed a criminal conviction where an “Allen charge” was clearly coercive despite the defense attorney’s failure to object to the charge. United States v. Smith,…