HENRY

v.

MISSISSIPPI

Citator

Cited By

• Rogen v. Ilikon Corp., 361 F.2d 260 (1st Cir. 1966)
  …e of action in the transaction in question.” Restatement, Torts § 538(2) (a). It correctly observed that this standard applies in 10b-5 situations, citing List v. Fashion Park, Inc., 2 Cir., 1965, 340 F. 2d 457, cert. denied sub nom. List v. Lerner, 381 U.S. 908, 85 S.Ct. 1536, 14 L.Ed.2d 432, and Kohler v. Kohler Co., 7 Cir., 1963, 319 F. 2d 634, both of which cases describe as “material” those facts about a corporation’s business “which in reasonable and objective contemplation might affect the value of t…
• United States v. Lewis Food Co., Inc., 366 F.2d 710 (9th Cir. 1966)
  …er the Criminal Appeals Act of 1907 (34 Stat. 1246), as amended, 18 U.S.C. § 3731 (1964), the United States appealed to the Supreme Court of the United States. The Supreme Court remanded the case to this court. United States v. Lewis Food Co., Inc., 381 U.S. 908, 85 S.Ct. 1534, 14 L. Ed.2d 431. The district court granted the motion to dismiss on the ground that the indictment failed to state an offense, and did not reach the constitutional question. United States v. Lewis Food Co., Inc., D.C.Cal., 236 F.Su…
• Symington Wayne Corp. v. Dresser Indus., Inc., 383 F.2d 840 (2d Cir. 1967)
  …f the four misrepresentations and omissions they allege are material and were or would be relied upon to an extent sufficient to justify an injunction. Compare List v. Fashion Park, Inc., 340 F. 2d 457 (2 Cir.), cert. denied sub nom. List v. Lerner, 381 U.S. 908, 85 S.Ct. 1535, 14 L.Ed.2d 432 (1965).1 Plaintiffs have not attempted to show that any of the stockholders who tendered their shares would probably not have tendered their shares if the two omissions from the advertisement had not occurred. The alle…