LANDON

v.

NORTHERN NATURAL GAS CO.

Citator

Cited By

• Twohy v. The First Nat'l Bank OF Chicago, 758 F.2d 1185 (7th Cir. 1985)
  …2d 904, 909 (1st Cir.1976); Jackson v. American Bar Ass’n, 538 F. 2d 829, 833 (9th Cir.1976); Freeman v. Continental Gin Co., 381 F. 2d 459, 469 (5th Cir.1967); Landon v. Northern Natural Gas Co., 338 F. 2d 17, 20 (10th Cir.1964), certiorari denied, 381 U.S. 914, 85 S.Ct. 1529, 14 L.Ed.2d 435 (1965). In Oremus the district court, as here, had dismissed plaintiffs’ complaint, entered judgment on the dismissal and denied plaintiffs’ subsequent motion to alter, amend or vacate the judgment and to grant leave…
• United States Labor Party v. Oremus, 619 F.2d 683 (7th Cir. 1980)
  …g a post-judgment amendment when the moving party had an opportunity to present the amendment earlier is a valid reason for a district court not to permit an amendment. Landon v. Northern Natural Gas Co., 338 F. 2d 17 (10th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 381 U.S. 914, 85 S.Ct. 1529, 14 L.Ed.2d 435 (1965). Plaintiffs argue they should have been able to add factual allegations to their complaint concerning the brief solicitation by members of the Lions Club on October 14, 1977. Since such an amendment would not a…
• James v. Watt, 716 F.2d 71 (1st Cir. 1983)
  …9 (1st Cir.1976); see United States Labor Party v. Oremus, 619 F. 2d 683, 692 (7th Cir.1980); Jackson v. American Bar Association, 538 F. 2d 829, 833 (9th Cir.1976); Landon v. Northern Natural Gas Co., 338 F. 2d 17, 20 (10th Cir.1964), cert. denied, 381 U.S. 914, 85 S.Ct. 1529, 14 L.Ed.2d 435 (1965). We have no reason to believe that the plaintiffs’ failure to amend earlier was inadvertent. For one thing, their attorney here is the same attorney who handled the appeal in Epps v. Andrus, supra. Therefore,…