WALKER
v.
WILSON, WARDEN

U.S. | 1965-05-24
No. 1093
381 U.S. 927 Supreme Court of the United States (1965) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Cotner v. United States, 409 F.2d 853 (10th Cir. 1969)
    ….” Josey v. United States Board of Parole, 116 U.S. App.D.C. 8, 320 F. 2d 730 (1963); Starnes v. Markley, 343 F. 2d 535 (7th Cir. 1965) cert. den. 382 U.S. 908, 86 S.Ct. 246, 15 L.Ed.2d 160; Hodge v. Markley, 339 F. 2d 973 (7th Cir. 1965) cert. den. 381 U.S. 927, 85 S.Ct. 1564, 14 L.Ed.2d 685. . “A postponement beyond 30 days will not be granted except in the discretion of the Board.” Form 59A. “Once the violation is established or admitted, the exercise of discretion in determining whether or not parole s…
  • DOE v. Dep't OF Transp., 412 F.2d 674 (8th Cir. 1969)
    …2 U.S. 913, 83 S.Ct. 729, 9 L.Ed.2d 722. 2. The applicant has the burden of proof of demonstrating error in the denial of the certificate he requests under § 602, 49 U.S.C. § 1422. Carrington v. CAB, 337 F. 2d 913, 914 (4 Cir. 1964) , cert. denied, 381 U.S. 927, 85 S. Ct. 1565, 14 L.Ed.2d 686. 3. Our standard on review is whether the findings of fact are supported by substantial evidence. If so, the Board’s findings are conclusive upon us. Section 1006(e) of the Act, 49 U.S.C. § 1486(e). Nebraska Dep’t o…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw