GUNSTON

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Vandenberg v. Dairy Equip. Co., 740 F.2d 1560 (Fed. Cir. 1984)
  …ensions from that patent in designing DEC’s system. The copying of an invention may constitute evidence that the invention is not an obvious one. Troy Co. v. Products Research Co., 339 F. 2d 364, 367, 144 USPQ 51, 53 (9th Cir.1964), cert, dismissed, 381 U.S. 930, 85 S.Ct. 1762, 14 L.Ed.2d 689 (1965). This would be particularly true where the copyist had itself attempted for a substantial length of time to design a similar device, and had failed. There are several reasons, however, why this principle should…
• Hackathorn v. J. E. (Bill) Decker, 369 F.2d 150 (5th Cir. 1966)
  …f insanity against appellant, found him guilty of murder, and assessed his penalty at death. The case was appealed to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, and writs to the United States Supreme Court were applied for and denied. Hackathorn v. Texas, 381 U.S. 930, 85 S.Ct. 1570, 14 L.Ed.2d 688. Thus, all available State Court remedies having been exhausted, [*152] a petition for habeas corpus was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas. After a full evidentiary hearing, t…
• Am. Safety Flight Sys., Inc. v. The Garrett Corp., 528 F.2d 288 (9th Cir. 1975)
  …ing Co., 83 F. 2d 345, 350 (9th Cir. 1936). See Bigelow v. Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co., 225 U.S. 111, 32 S.Ct. 641, 56 L.Ed. 1009 (1912); Troy Co. v. Products Research Co., 339 F. 2d 364 (9th Cir. 1964), petition for cert. dismissed, 381 U.S. 930, 85 S.Ct. 1762, 14 L.Ed.2d 689 (1965); Bros, Inc. v. W. E. Grace Manufacturing Co., 261 F. 2d 428 (5th Cir. 1958); E. I. DuPont de Nemours & Co. v. Sylvania Industrial Corp., 122 F. 2d 400 (4th Cir. 1941); Rohm & Haas Co. v. Chemical Insecticide C…