COTTOM
v.
CALIFORNIA ET AL.; JOHNSON V. BURKE, WARDEN; COPESTICK V. RHAY, PENITENTIARY SUPERINTENDENT; HUNTER V. PRASSE, CORRECTIONAL COMMISSIONER, ET AL.; AND SELZ V. CALIFORNIA

U.S. | 1965-06-01
Nos. 1224; No. 1270; No. 1294; No. 1302; No. 1330
381 U.S. 932 Supreme Court of the United States (1965) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • United States v. Guest, 383 U.S. 745 (U.S. 1966)
    …red paragraphs of the indictment. 246 F. Supp. 475. [*749] The United States appealed directly to this Court under the Criminal Appeals Act, 18 U. S. C. § 3731.2 We postponed decision of the question of our jurisdiction to the hearing on the merits. 381 U. S. 932. It is now apparent that this Court does not have jurisdiction to decide one of the issues sought to be raised on this direct appeal. As to the other issues, however, our appellate jurisdiction is clear, and for the reasons that follow, we reverse t…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw