CONSOLO

v.

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Consolo v. Fed. Mar. Comm'n, 383 U.S. 607 (U.S. 1966)
  …he discretion granted it under Section 22 of the Shipping Act11 [to issue reparation awards] . . . 119 U. S. App. D. C. 345, 352, 342 F. 2d 924, 931. Consolo petitioned this Court for a writ of certiorari to review that decision, which we granted. 381 U. S. 933. I. The first question we have is whether the Court of Appeals had jurisdiction of the appeals filed by Consolo and Flota.12 [*613] As we read the controlling statutory provisions, it seems clear that the Court of Appeals had jurisdiction to consi…
• Romasanta v. United Airlines, Inc., 537 F.2d 915 (7th Cir. 1976)
  …esentation. In a true class action, it is unnecessary for an unnamed class member to intervene as long as his interests are being protected by his class representatives. In Alleghany Corporation v. Kirby, 344 F. 2d 571 (2d Cir. 1965), cert. granted, 381 U.S. 933, 85 S.Ct. 1772, 14 L.Ed.2d 698, cert. dismissed as improvidently granted, 384 U.S. 28, 86 S.Ct. 1250, 16 L.Ed.2d 345 (1966), where the Second Circuit denied a “last-minute” attempt at intervention by shareholders in a derivative suit to set aside a…
• Kupferman v. Consol. Research & Mfg. Corp., 459 F.2d 1072 (2d Cir. 1972)
  …lation to Consolidated or were under any order to produce all relevant documents. Cf. Alleghany Corp. v. Kirby, 333 F. 2d 327, 341-343 (2 Cir. 1964) (dissenting opinion), aff’d by an equally divided court, 340 F. 2d 311 (2 Cir. 1965), cert. granted, 381 U.S. 933, 85 S. Ct. 1772, 14 L.Ed.2d 698, dismissed as improvidently granted, 384 U.S. 28, 86 S.Ct. 1250, 16 L.Ed.2d 335 (1966). Although Judge Frank said in Phelan v. Middle States Oil Corp., 154 F. 2d 978, 991-992 (2 Cir. 1946), that a receiver “is a tru…