NATIONAL BULK CARRIERS, INC.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Consolo v. Fed. Mar. Comm'n, 383 U.S. 607 (U.S. 1966)
  …he discretion granted it under Section 22 of the Shipping Act11 [to issue reparation awards] . . . 119 U. S. App. D. C. 345, 352, 342 F. 2d 924, 931. Consolo petitioned this Court for a writ of certiorari to review that decision, which we granted. 381 U. S. 933. I. The first question we have is whether the Court of Appeals had jurisdiction of the appeals filed by Consolo and Flota.12 [*613] As we read the controlling statutory provisions, it seems clear that the Court of Appeals had jurisdiction to consi…
• Int'l Railways OF Cent. Am. v. United Fruit Co., 373 F.2d 408 (2d Cir. 1967)
  …state court was challenged and upheld by it, albeit erroneously. See Treinies v. Sunshine Mining Co., 308 U.S. 66, 60 S.Ct. 44, 84 L.Ed. 85 (1939); Alleghany Corp. v. Kirby, 340 F. 2d 311, 312, n. 1 (2 Cir.), cert. granted, Holt v. Alleghany Corp., 381 U.S. 933, 85 S.Ct. 1772, 14 L.Ed.2d 698 (1965), dismissed, 384 U.S. 28, 86 S.Ct. 1250, 16 L.Ed.2d 335 (1966). . Section 62k of the Restatement suggests that where the plaintiff sues in a court whose sovereign cannot or has not made available a court which c…