HILBRICH

v.

UNITED STATES; AND USELDING V. UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (26 total)

• United States v. Nobles, 422 U.S. 225 (U.S. 1975)
  …y, 276 F. 2d 617 (CA7 1960), rev’d on other grounds, 365 U. S. 312 (1961). The cases have held records of witness statements made by prosecutors to be disclosable under 18 U. S. C. § 3500, United States v. Hilbrich, 341 F. 2d 555 (CA7), cert. den., 381 U. S. 941, reh. den., 382 U. S. 874 (1965), and 384 U. S. 1028 (1966); United States v. Aviles, 315 F. 2d 186 (CA2 1963); Saunders v. United States, 114 U. S. App. D. C. 345, 316 F. 2d 346 (1963); United States v. Smaldone, 484 F. 2d 311 (CA10 1973), cert. de…
• Goldberg v. United States, 425 U.S. 94 (U.S. 1976)
  …y reached the same conclusion. Saunders v. United States, 114 U. S. App. D. C. 345, 349, 316 F. 2d 346, 350 (1963) (Reed, J.); United States v. Aviles, 315 F. 2d 186, 191 (CA2 1963); United States v. Hilbrich, 341 F. 2d 555, 557 (CA7), cert. denied, 381 U. S. 941 (1965); United States v. Smaldone, 484 F. 2d 311, 317 (CA10 1973), cert. denied, 415 U. S. 915 (1974). Some courts have suggested that the trial court has an “affirmative duty” to secure the necessary evidence. E. g., Saunders v. United States, sup…
• United States v. Harris, 542 F.2d 1283 (7th Cir. 1976)
  …Harris’ testimony against Patterson struck, but we need not decide this issue. It was not error for the court to permit the testimony to be used against the other defendants. In United States v. Hilbrich, 341 F. 2d 555 (7th Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 381 U.S. 941, 85 S.Ct. 1775,14 L.Ed.2d 704, this court held that when a district court found no bad faith and no prejudice to a defendant, an FBI agent’s destruction of interview notes which had been incorporated into a formal report did not violate the Jencks A…