AZZONE
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1965-06-01
No. 1138
381 U.S. 943 Supreme Court of the United States (1965) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Wright v. United States, 732 F.2d 1048 (2d Cir. 1984)
    …he result “a complete miscarriage of justice” or “inconsistent with the rudimentary demands of fair procedure.” Compare Grimes v. United States, 607 F. 2d 6, 11 (2 Cir.1979) with Azzone v. United States, 341 F. 2d 417, 418-19 (8 Cir.), cert. denied, 381 U.S. 943, 85 S.Ct. 1782, 14 L.Ed.2d 706 (1965). We thus reach the question whether the existence of what we will assume to have been a special interest of Puccio’s in securing Wright’s indictment constituted a violation of due process, and thus a constituti…
  • Dick v. Scroggy, 882 F.2d 192 (6th Cir. 1989)
    …cuting attorney shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which he ... [h]as a financial interest in the subject matter in controversy or in a party to the proceeding...."). . See Azzone v. United States, 341 F. 2d 417 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 381 U.S. 943, 85 S.Ct. 1782, 14 L.Ed.2d 706 (1965) (application for writ of error coram nobis denied where defendant alleged, among other things, that his indictment had been motivated by U.S. Attorney’s political ambitions).…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw