COLE ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (52 total)

• State v. Hipolito Barreiro, 432 So. 2d 138 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)
  …e corporate documents in his custody even though the documents incriminate him personally); Wilson v. United States, 221 U.S. 361, 31 S.Ct. 538, 55 L.Ed. 771 (1911) (same); Hair Industry, Ltd. v. United States, 340 F. 2d 510 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 381 U.S. 950, 85 S.Ct. 1804, 14 L.Ed.2d 724 (1965) (same); Fineberg v. United States, 393 F. 2d 417 (9th Cir.1968) (same, close corporation); Gerardo v. State, 355 So. 2d 1221 (Fla.3d DCA), cert. denied, 364 So. 2d 885 (Fla.1978) (defendant’s act of producing bo…
• Taylor v. State, 612 So. 2d 626 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993)
  …f the defendants to collect his contingent fee. When the issue was first presented to this court, State v. Glosson, 441 So. 2d 1178 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983), this court relied upon Williamson v. United States, 311 F. 2d 441 (5th Cir.1962), cert. denied, 381 U.S. 950, 85 S.Ct. 1803, 14 L.Ed.2d 724 (1965) which holds that, in the absence of justification or explanation, a conviction based on evidence of an informer hired under a contingent fee arrangement may not stand. This court recognized that Williamson had b…
• Donaldson v. United States, 400 U.S. 517 (U.S. 1971)
  …ene as of right simply because it is his tax liability that is the subject of the summons. Instead, we agree with the opposing conclusion reached by the Fifth Circuit here, 418 F. 2d, at 1218, and in In re Cole, 342 F. 2d 5, 7-8 (CA2), cert. denied, 381 U. S. 950 (1965), and O’Donnell v. Sullivan, 364 F. 2d 43, 44 (CA1), cert. denied, 385 U. S. 969 (1966). VI We turn, then, to Donaldson’s particular situation. The material sought, as has been.noted, consists only, of Acme’s routine business records in whic…

  ← 1 / 2 →