HERNANDEZ

v.

CALIFORNIA

Citator

Cited By (15 total)

• Hansford v. United States, 365 F.2d 920 (D.C. Cir. 1966)
  …he contention of one or two of our colleagues as to their construction of Robinson v. State of California, 370 U.S. 660, 662, 82 S.Ct. 1417, 8 L.Ed.2d 758 (1962); cf. Castle v. United States, 120 U.S.App.D.C. 398, 347 F. 2d 492 (1964), cert. denied, 381 U.S. 953, 85 S.Ct. 1811, 14 L.Ed.2d 726 (1965). But see our discussion in Heard v. United States, supra note 1. . 106 U.S.App.D.C. 133, 135, 270 F. 2d 326, 328 (1959). . Whalem v. United States, 120 U.S.App.D.C. 331, 335, 346 F. 2d 812, 816, cert. denied,…
• Watson v. United States, 439 F.2d 442 (D.C. Cir. 1970)
  …y says that criminal sanctions may be imposed with respect to the possession of narcotics, I can only assume it does not intend to include possession by addicts not engaged in trafficking. . 120 U.S.App.D.C. 398, 347 F. 2d 492 (1964), cert. denied, 381 U.S. 953, 85 S.Ct. 1811, 14 L.Ed.2d 726, rehearing denied, 382 U.S. 874, 86 S.Ct. 13, 15 L.Ed.2d 16 (1965). . The Narcotic Addict Rehabilitation Act of 1966, 80 Stat. 1438. The substantive provisions of this statute are preceded by a declaration of Congress…
• United States v. Gerard, 491 F.2d 1300 (9th Cir. 1974)
  …n general, Note, The Unconstitutionality of Plea Bargaining, 83 Harv.L.Rev. 1387 (1970), plea bargaining by a prosecutor is a well accepted procedure. Chaffin v. Stynchcombe, ante; Cortez v. United States, 337 F. 2d 699 (9th Cir. 1964), cert. denied 381 U.S. 953, 85 S.Ct. 1811, 14 L.Ed.2d 726. If, as part of that process, a prosecutor may properly indicate the risks in not pleading guilty, whether of a larger sentence or of a larger exposure, see Brady v. United States, 397 U.S. 742, 750, 90 S. [*1306] Ct.…