DIXON STANFORD

v.

STATE

Citator

Cited By

• Fed. Ins. Co. v. Allan H. Applestein & the Allan H. Applestein Found. Tr. & Robert Mackin, 377 So. 2d 229 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)
  …he trial court in the case sub judice correctly held that the garnishee insurance company was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Accord, e. g. Consolidated Mutual Ins. Co. v. Ivy Liquors, Inc., 185 So. 2d 187 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966), cert. denied, 189 So. 2d 633 (Fla. 1966); cases collected in Annot., supra, at 2 A.L.R.3d 1246-1248. The appellees contend that, even though the face of the fourth amended complaint alleges otherwise, Federal nonetheless was required to defend because the “actual facts,” as de…
• Gertrude Tozier v. Jarvis, 469 So. 2d 884 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985)
  …ubstantial evidence” necessary to rebut the presumption, the court ordered a directed verdict in favor of the plaintiff. The court ordered a new trial solely on the issue of damages. In Becker v. Adkins, 184 So. 2d 682 (Fla. 1st DCA), cert. denied, 189 So. 2d 633 (Fla. 1966), the court reversed a judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of the defendant, who had struck the plaintiff from behind while both cars were moving. The defendant had testified that he remembered nothing about the accident, and the…
• Cigarette Racing Team, Inc. v. Parliament Ins. Co., 395 So. 2d 1238 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981)
  …t’s untimely withdrawal and filed an affidavit specifying instances of prejudice in opposition to Parliament’s motion for summary judgment. See Consolidated Mutual Insurance Co. v. Ivy Liquors, Inc., 185 So. 2d 187 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1966), cert. denied, 189 So. 2d 633 (Fla.1966). Parliament asserts that the alleged prejudice is non-existent and, of course, it may be correct. However, since an allegation of prejudice generally requires a factual determination, we believe the trial court erred in granting summary j…

Authorities Cited

• Onan v. Gerstein, 185 So. 2d 204 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966)