ALAMO EXPRESS, INC., ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.

U.S. | 1965-10-11
No. 357
382 U.S. 19 Supreme Court of the United States (1965) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …mission actions reconsidering [*921] granted authority, those cases have broadly construed the Commission’s power to reopen proceedings. See Alamo Express, Inc. v. United States, W.D.Tex.1965, 239 F.Supp. 694, 697-98 (three judge court), aff’d 1965, 382 U.S. 19, 86 S.Ct. 83, 15 L.Ed.2d 14. See also American Farm Lines v. Black Ball Freight Service, 1969, 397 U.S. 532, 540-42, 90 S.Ct. 1288, 25 L.Ed.2d 547. The Commission’s action in reinstating the RNX authority should be considered action on reconsiderati…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw