CASSESE
v.
PEYTON, PENITENTIARY SUPERINTENDENT
CASSESE
PEYTON, PENITENTIARY SUPERINTENDENT
382 U.S. 21
Supreme Court of the United States (1965)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Harney v. William M. Moore Bldg. Corp. & Lopier Constr. Corp., 359 F.2d 649 (2d Cir. 1966)…U.S. 920, 72 S.Ct. 367, 96 L.Ed. 688 (1952), and has been held to be effective to waive Jones Act rights, Braadt v. City of New York, 21 A.D.2d 957, 251 N.Y.S.2d 376 (3rd Dept.1964), aff’d 15 N.Y.2d 875, 258 N.Y.S.2d 413, 206 N.E. 2d 349, cert. den. 382 U.S. 21, 86 S.Ct. 83, 15 L.Ed.2d 14 (1965). But since the record at present does not disclose any award, let alone a waiver, Harney was not shown to be barred under this provision. A final compensation order or award has been said to be res judicata, barri…