AMERICAN TRUCKING ASSOCIATIONS, INC., ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.

U.S. | 1966-01-17
No. 510
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Harlan are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
382 U.S. 372 Supreme Court of the United States (1966) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Harlan are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Central Freight Lines (Substituted in place of Steere Tank Lines v. Interstate Commerce Comm'n & United States, 899 F.2d 413 (5th Cir. 1990)
    …private motor carriage. Motor Transportation of Property Within a Single State, 94 M.C.C. 541 (1964), aff'd sub nom Pennsylvania R.R. Co. v. United States, 242 F.Supp. 890 (E.D.Pa.1965), aff'd mem. sub nom American Trucking Ass’ns v. United States, 382 U.S. 372, 86 S.Ct. 533, 15 L.Ed.2d 421 (1966). In Behnken, the ICC applied the Pennsylvania rationale to determine that it lacked jurisdiction to regulate a single-state motor carrier movement of goods preceded by an unregulated for-hire bulk barge movement…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw