NEWSPAPER DRIVERS & HANDLERS LOCAL UNION NO. 372, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS, WAREHOUSEMEN & HELPERS OF AMERICA, INC.
v.
DETROIT NEWSPAPER PUBLISHERS ASSOCIATION ET AL.

U.S. | 1966-01-17
No. 663
382 U.S. 374 Supreme Court of the United States (1966) Caution
Cited by 10 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The dissenting opinion argues that accident reports and information furnished by a driver to law enforcement for highway safety purposes are privileged and cannot be used as evidence in subsequent litigation, emphasizing strict construction of the statute.


Holding

The dissenting opinion asserts that the statute's privilege regarding accident reports should be strictly construed and not extended to situations not clearly intended by the legislature, particularly when the purpose is solely to gather statistical data for highway safety.


Facts & Procedural History

The case concerns a statute requiring drivers involved in accidents to report them to the Department of Public Safety for highway safety program devel…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit is granted, the judgments are vacated and the case is remanded to that court with instructions that the case be remanded to the National Labor Relations Board for further consideration in light of American Ship Building Co. v. Labor Board, 380 U. S. 300.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …gitimate bargaining position is in any way inconsistent with the right to bargain collectively or with [*573] the right to strike/ S.Ct. p. 963. Id. p. 310, 85 See also Detroit Newspaper Publishers Ass’n v. NLRB, 346 F. 2d 527, vacated and remanded 382 U.S. 374, 86 S.Ct. 543, 15 L.Ed.2d 423 (1966). Petitions for review denied and enforcement granted. . The Association has represented the Publishers in bargaining with a total of 14 unions, 9 of which are on a multiem-ployer basis and 5 are on an individua…
  • …shers Association v. NLRB, 346 F. 2d 527 (6th Cir. 1965), vacated, Newspaper Drivel's and Handlers, Local Union No. 372, Intern. Broth, of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and [*889] Helpers of America, Inc. v. Detroit Newspaper Publishers Ass’n, 382 U.S. 374, 86 S.Ct. 543, 15 L.Ed.2d 423 (1966). In that case, however, there was no finding, as there was here, that the lockout was part of an improper bargaining scheme and therefore violated section 8(a) (3) of the Act. Since the lockout in this case was…
  • OIL v. Occupational Safety & Health Review Comm'n, 671 F.2d 643 (D.C. Cir. 1982)
    …o appeal. In many instances, appeals by private parties from the dismissal of an administrative action have gone forward without the filing of an appeal by the prosecutorial agency. See, e.g., Newspaper Drivers v. Detroit Newspaper Publishers Assn., 382 U.S. 374, 86 S.Ct. 543, 15 L.Ed.2d 423 (1966). The power to seek judicial review of a decision of an adjudicatory agency has never been vested solely in the prosecutorial arm of that agency. . In instances where the Secretary has not furnished the court wit…

Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw