MILLER
v.
BIGGS, CHIEF JUDGE, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS

U.S. | 1965-10-11
No. 19
382 U.S. 805 Supreme Court of the United States (1965) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …preme Court. The Supreme Court was asked to order Judge Fulton to call a three-judge court to consider the constitutionality of the Tax Court. The petition was promptly denied by the Supreme Court. Ginsberg, Trustee v. Fulton, U. S. District Judge, 382 U.S. 805, 86 S.Ct. 129, 15 L.Ed.2d 113 (1965). In waiving sovereign immunity and creating rights in individuals against the United States, Congress may provide “only an administrative remedy,” or it may grant the claimant only a judicial remedy, or it “may…
  • United States v. D'Andrea, 612 F.2d 1386 (7th Cir. 1980)
    …of a mandamus to the Supreme Court. Hobson v. Hansen, 256 F.Supp. 18, 19 n.2 (D.C.1966); Kirk v. Board of Education, 236 F.Supp. 1020 (E.D.Pa.1964); Miller v. Smith, 236 F.Supp. 927, 931, 934 (E.D.Pa.), leave to file a petition for mandamus refused, 382 U.S. 805, 86 S.Ct. 92, 15 L.Ed.2d 113 (1965).2 Recent revisions in the three-judge court statutes have greatly reduced the number of occasions on which they can be convened. Of sufficient importance to the present discussion, however, is the conclusion that…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw