UNITED STATES

v.

O'MALLEY ET AL., EXECUTORS

Citator

Cited By

• Brookhart v. Janis, 384 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1966)
  …ional contentions and ordered him remanded to custody. 2 Ohio St. 2d 36, 205 N. E. 2d 911. We granted certiorari to determine whether Ohio denied petitioner’s constitutional right to be confronted with and to cross-examine the witnesses against him. 382 U. S. 810. In this Court respondent admits that: “[I]f there was here a denial of cross-examination without waiver, it would be constitutional error of the first magnitude and no amount of showing of want of prejudice would cure it.” This concession is pro…
• Wallis v. Pan Am. Petroleum Corp., 384 U.S. 63 (U.S. 1966)
  …thwart the transfer of these federally granted leases. The opinion acknowledged [*67] an apparent conflict with the Tenth Circuit’s decision in Blackner v. McDermott, 176 F. 2d 498.4 We granted certiorari and invited the views of the United States, 382 U. S. 810, which filed a brief amicus curiae. We now reverse the Court of Appeals. The question before us is whether in general federal or state law should govern the dealings of private parties in an oil and gas lease validly issued under the Mineral Leasi…
• Elfbrandt v. Russell, 384 U.S. 11 (U.S. 1966)
  …d remanded the cause for reconsideration in light of Baggett v. Bullitt, 377 U. S. 360. See 378 U. S. 127. On reconsideration the Supreme Court of Arizona reinstated the original judgment. 97 Ariz. 140, 397 P. 2d 944. The case is here on certiorari. 382 U. S. 810. The oath reads in conventional fashion as follows: 1 “I, (type or print name) do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution and laws of the State of Arizona; that I will bear true fai…