WILLIAMS

v.

HOWARD JOHNSON'S, INC., OF WASHINGTON

Citator

Cited By (36 total)

• Douglas Oil Co. of Cal. v. Petrol Stops Northwest, 441 U.S. 211 (U.S. 1979)
  …showing justification. Accord, Illinois v. Sarbaugh, 552 F. 2d 768, 774 (CA7), cert. denied sub nom. J. L. Simmons Co. v. Illinois, 434 U. S. 889 (1977); U. S. Industries, Inc. v. United States District Court, 345 F. 2d 18, 21 (CA9), cert. denied, 382 U. S. 814 (1965); 1 C. Wright, Federal Practice & Procedure § 106, p. 173 (1969). In sum, as so often is the situation in our jurisprudence, the court’s duty in a case of this kind is to weigh carefully the competing interests in light of the relevant circum…
• United States v. McRAE, 593 F.2d 700 (5th Cir. 1979)
  …. United States, 335 F. 2d 609 (5th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 964, 85 S.Ct. 656, 13 L.Ed.2d 559 (1965); wnere the actions of the defendant were less ambiguous than in Mann, Helms v. United States, 340 F. 2d 15 (5th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 814, 86 S.Ct. 33, 15 L.Ed.2d 62 (1965) (exact Mann language, but defendant kept double books and fabricated false cash tickets), etc. Countless distinguishments and variations followed, with disparate results, as our trial courts — doubtless abetted by…
• Sykes v. United States, 373 F.2d 607 (5th Cir. 1966)
  …rim.Proc. Plain error under Rule 52(b) means error both obvious and substantial. Many cases discussing “plain error” determine only whether or not the error affected substantial rights. Helms v. United States, 5 Cir. 1964, 340 F. 2d 15, cert. denied 382 U.S. 814, 86 S.Ct. 33, 15 L.Ed.2d 62. This approach is clearly justified where the error was clear, or where, assuming there was error, that error did not affect “substantial rights”, Thomas v. United States, 5 Cir. 1961, 287 F. 2d 527, cert. denied 366 U.S.…