HAYDEN

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Porter, 441 F.2d 1204 (8th Cir. 1971)
  …o Butler v. United States, 317 F. 2d 249, 255-256 (8 Cir. 1963), cert. denied, Benedec v. United States, 375 U.S. 836 and 838, 84 S.Ct. 67, 11 L.Ed.2d 65, 84 S.Ct. 77, 11 L.Ed.2d 65; Hayden v. United States, 343 F. 2d 459 (9 Cir. 1965), cert. denied 382 U.S. 828, 86 S.Ct. 63, 15 L.Ed.2d 72. Cf. Henderson v. United States, 425 F. 2d 134, 140-143 (5 Cir. 1970). We find each of the count mailings to be relevant to the overall scheme to defraud as set forth in the indictment and thus properly admissible in evi…
• McKISSICK v. United States, 379 F.2d 754 (5th Cir. 1967)
  …uance, remembering that there was only one witness for the prosecution and only two for the defense, we are unable to say that there was an abuse of discretion in this instance, cf. Joseph v. United States, 5 Cir., 1965, 343 F. 2d 755, cert. denied, 382 U.S. 828, 86 S.Ct. 65, 15 L.Ed.2d 73; Ray v. United States, 5 Cir., 1965, 352 F. 2d 521. 2. Allegedly improper closing argument. It is next contended that in his closing argument the United States Attorney improperly commented upon McKissick’s failure to t…
• United States v. Abshire, 471 F.2d 116 (5th Cir. 1972)
  …s that a motion for a continuance is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court, and the trial judge’s decision will not be disturbed unless he clearly abused his discretion. Joseph v. United States, 343 F. 2d 755 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U. S. 828, 86 S.Ct. 65, 15 L.Ed.2d 73 (1965). See also United States v. O’Brien, 466 F. 2d 517 (5th Cir. 1972) ; United States v. Valdez, 418 F. 2d 363 (5th Cir. 1969); Welsh v. United States, 404 F. 2d 414 (5th Cir. 1968). Appellant contends that the trial j…