ATLAS-PACIFIC ENGINEERING CO.
v.
GEO. W. ASHLOCK CO.
ATLAS-PACIFIC ENGINEERING CO.
GEO. W. ASHLOCK CO.
382 U.S. 842
Supreme Court of the United States (1965)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 10 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
SID & Marty Krofft Television Prods., Inc. v. McDONALD'S Corp. & Needham, 562 F.2d 1157 (9th Cir. 1977)…a of corporate profits, the — let’s see, that’s — ’ “THE COURT: ‘Let’s proceed. 27.’ ” . This same distinction is recognized in patent cases. For example, in Atlas-Pacific Engineering Co. v. Ashlock, 339 F. 2d 288, 290 (9 Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 842, 86 S.Ct. 55, 15 L.Ed.2d 83 (1965), this court recognized: “[T]here is a variety of possible elements of damages for patent infringement, such as the profits made by the infringer, the actual damage to the patentee . . . or a reasonable royalty . .…
-
Lockheed Aircraft Corp. v. The United States, 553 F.2d 69 (Cl. Ct. 1977)…October 28, 1954, conception date of Richter. Equivalency may be shown by the prior art. Tate, supra, 477 F. 2d at 1345, 201 Ct.Cl. at 727; American Technical Machine Corp. v. Caparotta, 339 F. 2d 557, 144 USPQ 115, 117 (2d Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 842, 86 S.Ct. 65, 15 L.Ed.2d 83 (1965). Thus, the “improved equivalent,” i.e., pulse compression, was available to those of ordinary skill in the art. for use of Richter’s invention when developed. Defendant argues further that no one in the radar art…
-
Consumers Union OF the United States, Inc. v. Consumer Prod. Safety Comm'n, 590 F.2d 1209 (D.C. Cir. 1978)…e familiar rule that “an intervenor generally is held to have waived his privilege to change the venue of a suit.” Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Train, 71 F.R.D. 391, 394 (N.D.Ill.1976), citing TWA v. CAB, 339 F. 2d 56, 64 (2d Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 842, 86 S.Ct. 40, 15 L.Ed.2d 82 (1965) and 3B. Moore’s Federal Practice § 24.19 (2d ed. 1975). . The Freedom of Information Act specifies “the district court of the United States in the district in which the complainant [requester] resides, or has his…
Previewing 3 of 10 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence