HALUSKA

v.

GARDNER, SECRETARY OF HEALTH, EDUCATION AND WELFARE

Citator

Cited By

• In re Madrid v. Lawyers Title Ins. Corp., 725 F.2d 1197 (9th Cir. 1984)
  …rly contrary to Nevada real property law. See, e.g., Nevada Land and Mortgage Co. v. Hidden Wells Ranch, Inc., 83 Nev. 501, 504-505, 435 P. 2d 198, 200-201 (1967); Golden v. Tomiyasu, 79 Nev. 503, 516-518, 387 P. 2d 989, 996-97 (1963), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 844, 86 S.Ct. 89, 15 L.Ed.2d 85 (1965). We also agree with appellees and amici that creation of a de facto right of redemption would significantly chill participation at foreclosure sales, where sale prices — not subject to the usual economic competiti…
• Uwamie Tomiyasu v. Golden, 358 F.2d 651 (9th Cir. 1966)
  …res judicata. The trial court granted appellees’ motion and entered summary judgment in their favor.1 On appeal in the second state action the Supreme Court of Nevada affirmed. The United States Supreme Court denied cer-tiorari. Tomiyasu v. Golden, 382 U.S. 844, 86 S.Ct. 89, 15 L.Ed.2d 85 (U.S. Oct. 11, 1965). On July 21, 1964, the two appellants in our instant case, without their father as a party, filed the present action in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, again asking that…
• Clark E. Finks v. The United States, 395 F.2d 999 (Ct. Cl. 1968)
  …t just compensation.” We are compelled, initially, to determine if there has been an appropriation, or seizure of property which constitutes a “taking”. Cuban Truck & Equipment Co. v. United States, 333 F. 2d 873, 166 Ct.Cl. 381 (1964), cert. denied 382 U.S. 844, 86 S.Ct. 65, 15 L.Ed.2d 85 (1965). We find that plaintiffs’ property was not appropriated within the scope of the Fifth Amendment, nor was it devoted to a “public use”. In Societe Cotonniere Du Tonkin v. United States, 171 F.Supp. 951, 145 Ct. Cl.…