TATUM ET AL.

v.

SINGER ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• DELTA AIR Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Bd., 561 F.2d 293 (D.C. Cir. 1977)
  …lt we reach, Pan American has referred us to two cases which it claims support such an outcome. See Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. CAB, 143 U.S. App.D.C. 8, 442 F. 2d 730 (1970); and Northeast Airlines, Inc. v. CAB, 345 F. 2d 484 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 845, 86 S.Ct. 41, 15 L.Ed.2d 85 (1965). Intervenor Western has replied by maintaining that both Delta and Northeast are distinguishable on their facts from the present situation. Indeed, the former case certainly does present a more egregious example of…
• DHL Corp. v. Civil Aeronautics Bd., 659 F.2d 941 (9th Cir. 1981)
  …843, 87 S.Ct. 73, 17 L.Ed.2d 75 (1966) (“affirmance of the Board’s [CAB’s] action is without prejudice to the right of the combination carriers to reopen the question”); Northeast Airlines, Inc. v. C.A.B., 345 F. 2d 488, 489 (1st Cir.) cert. denied, 382 U.S. 845, 86 S.Ct. 41,15 L.Ed.2d 85 (1965) (it is appropriate to remand to the CAB to consider the issue afresh in light of the most recent data). IV. CONCLUSION First, we hold that CAB orders 79-1-46 and 79-6-147 are moot and remand to the CAB with direct…