HALEY, ADMINISTRATRIX

v.

BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD CO. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (32 total)

• Barnes v. United States, 412 U.S. 837 (U.S. 1973)
  …also that the defendant knew the property received had been stolen from the mails.” See also S. Rep. No. 864, 76th Cong., 1st Sess (1939). United States v. Hines, 256 F. 2d 561 (CA2 1958); Smith v. United States, 343 F. 2d 539 (CA5), cert. denied, 382 U. S. 861 [*848] (1965); United States v. Gardner, 454 F. 2d 534 (CA9), cert. denied, 409 U. S. 867 (1972); United States v. Schultz, 462 F. 2d 622 (CA9 1972). Although affirmance of petitioner’s conviction on two of the six counts carrying identical concurr…
• Braniff Airways v. Civil Aeronautics Bd., 379 F.2d 453 (D.C. Cir. 1967)
  …or” principle announced for our general jurisprudence by decision and statute (e. g., 28 U.S.C. § 2111 (1964)) is applicable to the review of the decisions of administrative agencies. Kerner v. Celebrezze, 340 F. 2d 736, 740 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 861, 86 S.Ct. 121, 15 L.Ed.2d 99 (1965). Of course an error cannot be dismissed as [*466] “harmless” without taking into account the limited ability of a court to assume as a judicial function, even for the purpose of affirmance, the distinctive discret…
• DOE v. Hampton, 566 F.2d 265 (D.C. Cir. 1977)
  …question. Thus, we are not called upon to determine whether such' an opportunity would render the error harmless and comport with the regulations and the Constitution. . See, e. g., Kerner v. Celebrezze, 340 F. 2d 736, 740 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 861, 86 S.Ct. 121, 15 L.Ed.2d 99 (1965). . See cases cited infra notes 13-14. . Section 10(e) of the Administrative Procedure Act specifies that on judicial review of agency action “due account shall be taken of the rule of prejudical error.” 5 U.S.C…