ZEMEL

v.

RUSK, SECRETARY OF STATE, ET AL.; WATERMAN STEAMSHIP CORP. V. UNITED STATES; NATIONAL BULK CARRIERS, INC. V. UNITED STATES; ATLANTIC REFINING CO. V. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION; GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO. V. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION; JABEN V. UNITED STATES; AVGIKOS V. LOUISIANA; HOLLAND FURNACE CO. V. SCHNACKENBERG, U. S. CIRCUIT JUDGE, ET AL.; STROLLO V. UNITED STATES; SERMAN V. UNITED STATES; INTERLAKE STEAMSHIP CO. V. NIELSEN ET AL.; RANDALL ET AL. V. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE; TJONAMAN V. A/S GLITTRE ET AL.; W. M. R. WATCH CASE CORP. ET AL. V. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION; RATKE ET AL. V. UNITED STATES; CRAWFORD V. BANNAN, WARDEN

Citator

Cited By

• Cossette v. State, 221 So. 2d 427 (Fla. 4th DCA 1969)
  …503; Aguilar v. State of Texas, 1964, 378 U.S. 108, 84 S.Ct. 1509, 12 L.Ed.2d 723; United States v. Ventresca, 1965, 380 U.S. 102, 85 S.Ct. 741, 13 L.Ed.2d 684; and Jaben v. United States, 1965, 381 U.S. 214, 85 S.Ct. 1365, 14 L.Ed.2d 345 (reh. den. 382 U.S. 873, 86 S.Ct. 19, 15 L.Ed.2d 114). . United States v. Ventresca, 1965, 380 U.S. 102, 85 S.Ct. 741, 13 L.Ed.2d 684; State ex rel. Huston v. Clark, Fla.1935, 121 Fla. 161, 163 So. 471. . State v. Jatal, 1922, 152 Minn. 262, 188 N.W. 284; State v. Richma…
• News-Press Publ'g Co., Inc. v. Firestone, 527 So. 2d 223 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988)
  …ties so that the election process may be conducted in an orderly fashion, the right to speak and publish does not carry with it the unrestrained right to gather information. Zemel v. Rusk, 381 U.S. 1, 85 S.Ct. 1271, 14 L.Ed.2d 179, rehearing denied, 382 U.S. 873, 86 S.Ct. 17, 15 L.Ed.2d 114 (1965). Requiring reporters, photographers, solicitors, and exit poll takers to perform their activities more than fifty feet away from the polling place is a reasonable time, place, and manner restriction in view of the…
• United States v. United States Dist. Court FOR the E. Dist. OF Mich., 444 F.2d 651 (6th Cir. 1971)
  …the constitutional question, the former will be decided.” The Court will wait on a concrete fact situation in order to avoid rendering a series of advisory opinions. Zemel v. Rusk, 381 U.S. 1, 85 S.Ct. 1271, 14 L.Ed.2d 179 (1965), rehearing denied, 382 U.S. 873, 86 S.Ct. 17, 15 L.Ed.2d 114. The District Court should have followed the procedure adopted in Clay. Had it done so, it would not have been necessary to rule on the constitutional issues in this case. Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Proce…