UNITED STATES

v.

ALABAMA; UNITED STATES V. MISSISSIPPI; AND UNITED STATES V. LOUISIANA

Citator

Cited By

• Perry v. Commerce Loan Co., 383 U.S. 392 (U.S. 1966)
  …ed the plan on the ground that the previous bankruptcy was a bar thereto under [*394] the provisions of § 14 (c) (5) of the Act.2 On review the District Court upheld the dismissal. The Court of Appeals affirmed. 340 F. 2d 588. We granted certiorari, 382 U. S. 889, in view of a conflict on the point among the courts of appeals.3 We conclude that confirmations of wage-earner plans by way of extensions are not affected by §14 (c)(5), and, therefore, reverse the judgment below. I. Although statutory relief for…
• United States v. Holmes, 453 F.2d 950 (10th Cir. 1972)
  …der v. United States, 288 F. 2d 452, 453 (8th Cir. 1961), cert, denied 368 U.S. 851, 82 S.Ct. 86, 7 L.Ed.2d 49; see also United States v. Jenkins, 347 F. 2d 345 (4th Cir. 1965). . Lujan v. United States, 348 F. 2d 156 (10th Cir. 1965), cert, denied 382 U.S. 889, 86 S.Ct. 179, 15 L.Ed.2d 125. . Todd v. United States, 345 F. 2d 299 (10th Cir. 1965). . U.S.Const. Amend. VI. . Basker v. Crouse, 426 F. 2d 531, 532 (10th Cir. 1970); Hampton v. Oklahoma, 368 F. 2d 9, 12 (10th Cir. 1966). . Basker v. Crouse, 4…