HOBBS

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Cotner v. United States, 409 F.2d 853 (10th Cir. 1969)
  …e indicates a desire to waive the local hearing, then of course the court need not order such a hearing.” Josey v. United States Board of Parole, 116 U.S. App.D.C. 8, 320 F. 2d 730 (1963); Starnes v. Markley, 343 F. 2d 535 (7th Cir. 1965) cert. den. 382 U.S. 908, 86 S.Ct. 246, 15 L.Ed.2d 160; Hodge v. Markley, 339 F. 2d 973 (7th Cir. 1965) cert. den. 381 U.S. 927, 85 S.Ct. 1564, 14 L.Ed.2d 685. . “A postponement beyond 30 days will not be granted except in the discretion of the Board.” Form 59A. “Once the…
• Gaddy v. Michael, 519 F.2d 669 (4th Cir. 1975)
  …or rested on a conviction of an intervening criminal charge, Jones v. Rivers (4th Cir. 1964) 338 F. 2d 862, 878; Cotner v. United States [*673] (10th Cir. 1969) 409 F. 2d 853, 856; Starnes v. Markley (7th Cir. 1965) 343 F. 2d 535, 537, cert. denied 382 U.S. 908, 86 S.Ct. 246, 15 L.Ed.2d 160, and the “prima facie” hearing could be held elsewhere in these cases, usually at the prison itself. The final hearing, which is not subject to as stringent time requirements as the prima facie hearing, it being permiss…
• Moore v. Smith, 412 F.2d 720 (7th Cir. 1969)
  …d cannot be sustained by reference to the fact that petitioner subsequently pled guilty to the crimes for [*725] which he was arrested. This argument was rejected by this Court in Starnes v. Markley, 343 F. 2d 535 (7th Cir. 1965), certiorari denied, 382 U.S. 908, 86 S.Ct. 246, 15 L.Ed.2d 160, where parole violations other than crimes were admitted by the petitioner after the warrant had been issued and executed. The Court noted that the requirement in Hyser v. Reed, that the warrant contain a statement of t…