ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD CO. ET AL.

v.

NORFOLK & WESTERN RAILWAY CO. ET AL.; CALUMET HARBOR TERMINALS, INC., ET AL. V. NORFOLK & WESTERN RAILWAY CO. ET AL.; AND UNITED STATES ET AL. V. NORFOLK & WESTERN RAILWAY CO. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Shillitani v. United States, 384 U.S. 364 (U.S. 1966)
  …the Second Circuit affirmed each conviction in separate opinions. United States v. Pappadio, 346 F. 2d 5 (1965); United States v. Shillitani, 345 F. 2d 290 (1965). We granted certiorari to review the validity of the sentences imposed in both cases. 382 U. S. 913, 916 (1965). We hold that the conditional nature of these sentences renders each of the actions a civil contempt proceeding, for which indictment and jury trial are not constitutionally required. However, since the term of the grand jury before wh…
• Ill. Cent. R.R. Co. v. Norfolk & W. Ry. Co., 385 U.S. 57 (U.S. 1966)
  …trict, covering the use of the latter’s facilities. The court ordered a new hearing on all the issues, one judge concluding that such hearing should be limited to the subsequently executed nonexclusive use agreement. We noted probable jurisdiction, 382 U. S. 913, and reverse the judgment. [*60] I. Background of Lake Calumet Harbor Port. Lake Calumet Harbor Port is one of seven facilities within the Port of Chicago available for the handling of water-borne freight. It is a shallow lake approximately two mi…
• Interstate Commerce Comm'n v. Memphis Union Station Co., 360 F.2d 44 (6th Cir. 1966)
  …Rights, supra. See also Illinois Central Railroad Co. Construction and Trackage Rights, 307 I.C.C. 493 (1959), modified, 317 I.C.C. 502 (1962); Norfolk & Western Railway Company v. United States, 241 F.Supp. 974 (N.D.Ohio 1965), prob. juris, noted, 382 U.S. 913, 86 S.Ct. 288,15 L.Ed.2d 230 (1965). While not controlling of our decision, the administrative interpretation is entitled to great weight. Udall v. Tallman, 380 U.S. 1, 85 S.Ct. 792, 13 L.Ed.2d 616 (1965); Review Committee, Venue VII, Commodity Sta…