WALTHAM WATCH CO. ET AL.

v.

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION; GOSSER V. UNITED STATES; BANKERS BOND CO., INC., ET AL. V. ALL STATES INVESTORS, INC., ET AL.; MADDOX V. WILLIS ET AL.; REED V. UNITED STATES; SAMURINE V. UNITED STATES; DUVAL V. UNITED STATES; MCMULLEN V. GARDNER, SECRETARY OF HEALTH, EDUCATION AND WELFARE; SPIESEL V. CITY OF NEW YORK; VESAY V. UNITED STATES; MIGUEL V. UNITED STATES; HENDERSON V. MAXWELL, WARDEN; LEVY V. UNITED STATES; ANDERSON ET AL. V. UNITED STATES; HOURIHAN V. MAHONEY; WARRINER V. FINK ET AL.; KELLY V. KANSAS; LONG V. PATE, WARDEN

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Lyon, 397 F.2d 505 (7th Cir. 1968)
  …the burden of establishing that the evidence was unlawfully obtained. United States v. Melendez, 7 Cir., 355 F. 2d 914 (1966); Anderson v. United States, 10 Cir., 344 F. 2d 792, cert, denied, 382 U.S. 880, 86 S.Ct. 169, 15 L.Ed.2d 121, reh. denied, 382 U.S. 922, 86 S.Ct. 297, 15 L.Ed.2d 238 (1965); Addison v. United States, 5 Cir., 317 F. 2d 808 (1963), cert, denied, 376 U.S. 905, 84 S.Ct. 658, 11 L.Ed.2d 605, reh. denied, 376 U.S. 966, 84 S.Ct. 1121, 11 L.Ed.2d 984 (1964); Chin Kay v. United States, 9 Cir…
• United States v. Dolleris, 408 F.2d 918 (6th Cir. 1969)
  …ellant failed [*923] to renew this motion at the conclusion of the entire case or thereafter. As this court stated in United States v. Gosser, 339 F. 2d 102 (6th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 819, 86 S.Ct. 44, 15 L.Ed.2d 66 (1965), reh. denied, 382 U.S. 922, 86 S.Ct. 285, 15 L.Ed.2d 237 (1965): It is the settled rule that if a defendant at the close of the Government’s case moves for judgment of acquittal on the ground that the evidence is insufficient to support a verdict of guilty, and after the mot…
• Verlien W. Rosin v. Secretary of Health, 379 F.2d 189 (9th Cir. 1967)
  …findings of the Secretary based on [*192] the findings of the hearing examiner are supported by substantial evidence. Galli v. Celebrezze, 9 Cir., 339 F. 2d 924; McMullen v. Celebrezze, 9 Cir., 335 F. 2d 811, cert. den. 382 U.S. 854, rehearing den. 382 U.S. 922, 86 S.Ct. 295, 15 L. Ed.2d 238. The appellant was bom on October 14, 1920, and was therefore thirty-six years old when he suffered the stroke in July, 1957, and thirty-nine years old when he first became eligible for disability benefits in Septembe…