MIRANDA

v.

ARIZONA

Citator

Cited By

• United States ex rel. Christopher Romano v. Hon. Edward M. FAY, 360 F.2d 389 (2d Cir. 1966)
  …pus petition involving a' pre-Massiah conviction. But we do not think that the Supreme Court meant to foreclose “consideration” of the retroactivity question. This seems abundantly clear from the Court’s grant of certiorari in Johnson v. New Jersey, 382 U.S. 925, 86 S.Ct. 318, 15 L.Ed.2d 339 (Nov. 23, 1965), a case presently under .consideration in which retroactivity is the principal issue. In Linkletter v. Walker, 381 U.S. 618, 85 S.Ct. 1731, 14 L.Ed.2d 601 (1965), the Supreme Court held that the exclusi…
• United States v. Haywood Williams, 384 F.2d 488 (2d Cir. 1966)
  …Drummond, and Robinson, and in Gone concurred in the result only. . The Supreme Court has granted certiorari in several cases raising Escobedo issues which, as in Escobedo itself, involve certain state court convictions: E. g., Vignera v. New York, 382 U.S. 925, 86 S.Ct. 320, 15 L.Ed.2d 339 (1965); Miranda v. Arizona, 382 U.S. 925, 86 S.Ct. 320, 15 L.Ed.2d 338 (1965); Johnson v. New Jersey, 382 U.S. 925, 86 S.Ct. 318, 15 L.Ed.2d 339 (1965). . The lower court credited Kreppein’s version of the facts and ap…

  ← 1 / 3 →