UNITED STATES

v.

GENERAL MOTORS CORP. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Time, Inc. v. Hill, 385 U.S. 374 (U.S. 1967)
  …concurring opinions [*380] at the Appellate Division,” two judges dissenting. 15 N. Y. 2d 986, 207 N. E. 2d 604. We noted probable jurisdiction of the appeal to consider the important constitutional questions of freedom of speech and press involved. 382 U. S. 936. After argument last Term, the case was restored to the docket for reargument, 384 U. S. 995. We reverse and remand the case to the Court of Appeals for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion. I. Since the reargument, we have had t…
• Time, Inc. v. Hill, 384 U.S. 995 (U.S. 1966)
  …Appeal from Ct. App. N. Y. Probable jurisdiction noted, 382 U. S. 936. Argued April 27, 1966. This case is ordered restored to the docket for reargument at the next term of Court. Upon reargument, counsel are requested to discuss in their further briefs and oral arguments, in addition to the other issues, the followi…