ATLANTIC REFINING CO.

v.

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

Citator

Cited By (21 total)

• United States v. Flannery, 451 F.2d 880 (1st Cir. 1971)
  …Panaccione v. United States, 396 U.S. 837, 90 S.Ct. 97, 24 L.Ed. 2d 88. Third, as we have pointed out before, the court should remind the jury of the burden of proof. See Pugliano v. United States, 1 Cir., 1965, 348 F. 2d 902, 903-04, cert. denied 382 U.S. 939, 86 S. Ct. 390, 15 L.Ed.2d 349. In Tuey itself, the reference was clear. 8 Cush. (62 Mass.) at 2. Finally, as counsel persuasively urged upon us, we expressly disapprove the Tuey statement that “the case must at some time be decided.” 8 Cush. (62 M…
• Am. Cyanamid Co. v. Fed. Trade Comm'n, 363 F.2d 757 (6th Cir. 1966)
  …erman and Clayton Acts. “This construction allows for using cases decided under any of the antitrust laws in dealing with cases brought by the Commission.” Atlantic Refining Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, 344 F. 2d 599, 606 (C.A. 6), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 939, 86 S.Ct. 391, 15 L.Ed.2d 350. [*771] The Federal Trade Commission Act contains no statutory exemption10 of Patent Office proceedings, and we find nothing in the Act indicating any intention to set aside the Patent Office as a “city of refuge”11 fro…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Saft, 558 F.2d 1073 (2d Cir. 1977)
  …ndant has shown no sufficient grounds for permitting withdrawal of a guilty plea, although such prejudice may be considered by the district court in exercising its discretion, see United States v. Giuliano, 348 F. 2d 217, 222 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 939, 86 S.Ct. 390, 15 L.Ed.2d 349 (1965); United States v. Lombardozzi, supra, 436 F. 2d at 881; United States v. Michaelson, supra, 552 F. 2d at 474-475, & n. 3. Moreover, if, as the Government represents, the co-defendants had agreed to cooperate, its…