METAL PRODUCTS WORKERS UNION LOCAL 1645, UAW-AFL-CIO, ET AL.

v.

TORRINGTON CO.

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

• The Torrington Co. v. Metal Prods. Workers Union Local 1645, UAW, AFL-CIO, 362 F.2d 677 (2d Cir. 1966)
  …uld be applicable to a recall grievance if there were “some special agreement making it applicable or * * * some custom or common understanding which has that effect.” Torrington Co. v. Metal Prods. Workers, 347 F. 2d 93, 95 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 940, 86 S.Ct. 394, 15 L.Ed.2d 351 (1965). This is a clearÍ statement of the view that it is proper! to look beyond the terms of a labor con-j tract in interpreting it. In United Steelworkers of America v. Warrior & Gulf Nav. Co., 363 U.S. 574, 580, 80 S…
• United States v. Valencia, 645 F.2d 1158 (2d Cir. 1980)
  …denied, 375 U.S. 884, 84 S.Ct. 158, 11 L.Ed.2d 114 (1963): “If the inducement had come from parties having no connection with the government it would absolve him in no degree.” United States v. Laverick, 348 F. 2d 708, 713 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 940, 89 S.Ct. 391, 15 L.Ed.2d 350 (1965): “It is obvious that a private individual may only be an entrapping party when an agency relationship exists between himself and the Government.” United States v. Perl, 584 F. 2d 1316, 1322 n.5 (4th Cir. 1978),…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Hernandez, 779 F.2d 456 (8th Cir. 1985)
  …ties unless persuaded that they probably prejudiced the defendant and that the prejudice was not removed effectively by the trial judge before submission of the case to the jury.” Keeble v. United States, 347 F. 2d 951, 956 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 940, 86 S.Ct. 394, 15 L.Ed.2d 350 (1965). “The grant or denial of a motion for mistrial is placed in the sound discretion of the district court and may only be reversed on a showing of abuse of discretion.” Powell, 771 F. 2d at 1175. There are numerous…