ARANDA
v.
CALIFORNIA; SANTOS V. WILSON; COLE V. RUSSELL, CORRECTIONAL SUPERINTENDENT; AND THOMPSON V. MACIEISKI, WARDEN

U.S. | 1965-12-13
Nos. 183; No. 618; No. 661; No. 684
382 U.S. 952 Supreme Court of the United States (1965) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (U.S. 1966)
  • Stanley v. Louie L. Wainwright, 406 F.2d 8 (5th Cir. 1969)
    …l Procedure Rule 1. now Rule 1.850, 33 F.S.A.2 (a state counterpart to 28 U.S.C. § 2255). Subsequently he carried his collateral attack through the Florida appellate system to the United States Supreme Court without relief. Stanley v. Florida, 1965, 382 U.S. 952, 86 S.Ct. 441, 15 L.Ed.2d 371. Stanley then applied to the United States District Court for a writ of ha-beas corpus. His petition was denied by the Judge as insufficient on its face without either a response from the State or an evidentiary hearing…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw