SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
v.
NEW ENGLAND ELECTRIC SYSTEM ET AL.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
NEW ENGLAND ELECTRIC SYSTEM ET AL.
382 U.S. 953
Supreme Court of the United States (1965)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Davis v. North Carolina, 384 U.S. 737 (U.S. 1966)…he District Judge again held that the confessions were voluntary. 221 F. Supp. 494. The Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, after argument and then resubmission en banc, affirmed with two judges dissenting. 339 F. 2d 770. We granted certiorari. 382 U. S. 953. We are not called upon in this proceeding to pass on the guilt or innocence of the petitioner of the atrocious crime that was committed. Nor are we called upon to determine whether the confessions obtained are true or false. Rogers v. Richmond, 36…
-
United States v. Cook, 384 U.S. 257 (U.S. 1966)…ation,” the District Court dismissed the indictment. Accord, Schmokey v. United States, 182 F. 2d 937 (C. A. 10th Cir. 1950). The United States brought a direct appeal pursuant to 18 U. S. C. § 3731 (1964 ed.), and we noted probable jurisdiction, 382 U. S. 953. Section 660 punishes embezzlements from a common carrier by either (1) “a president, director, officer, or manager of any firm, association, or corporation engaged in commerce as a common carrier,” or (2) “an employee of such common carrier riding…
-
Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. New England Elec. Sys., 384 U.S. 176 (U.S. 1966)…finding of total loss of economy or efficiency” (346 F. 2d, at 406), and, believing that on this record and with the statute so interpreted there could have been a finding in favor of NEES, remanded the case to the Commission. We granted certiorari, 382 U. S. 953. We agree with the Commission’s reading of Clause (A) and remand the cause to the Court of Appeals so that [*180] there may be a review of the challenged order in light of the proper meaning of the statutory term. The requirement in § 11 of a “sin…