FOREMOST DAIRIES, INC.

v.

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

Citator

Cited By (31 total)

• Daniels v. State, 381 So. 2d 707 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979)
  …ation of conspiratorial groups by undercover agents or informants. Merely because a normal investigative technique is theoretically possible, it does not follow that it is likely. See Giancana v. United States, 352 F. 2d 921 (7th) certiorari denied, 382 U.S. 959, 86 S.Ct. 437, 15 L.Ed.2d 362 (1965); New York v. Saperstein, 2 N.Y.2d 210, 159 N.Y.S.2d 160, 140 N.E. 2d 252 (1957). What the provision envisions is that the showing be tested in a practical and commonsense fashion. Compare United States v. Ventres…
• Shillitani v. United States, 384 U.S. 364 (U.S. 1966)
  …of a refusal to obey a court order to testify at any stage in judicial proceedings, the witness may be confined until compliance. McCrone v. United States, 307 U. S. 61 (1939); Giancana v. United States, 352 F. 2d 921 (C. A. 7th Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U. S. 959 (1965).6 The conditional [*371] nature of the imprisonment — based entirely upon the contemnor’s continued defiance — justifies holding civil contempt proceedings absent the safeguards of indictment and jury, Uphaus v. Wyman, 364 U. S. 388, 403-404…
• Sherrie Bursey and Brenda Joyce Presley v. United States, 466 F.2d 1059 (9th Cir. 1972)
  …and Seventh Circuits that imply that immunity conferred under former 47 U.S.C. § 409(l) was coextensive with the questions asked. (See In re Grand Jury Investigation of Giancana (7th Cir. 1965) 352 F. 2d 921, cert. denied, Giancana v. United States, 382 U.S. 959, 86 S.Ct. 437, 15 L.Ed.2d 362, and Marcus v. United States (3d Cir. 1962) 310 F. 2d 143, cert. denied, 372 U.S. 944, 83 S.Ct. 933, 9 L.Ed.2d 969.) We doubt that the same courts would construe Section 2514 as they did Section 409 (Í). But if our doub…

  ← 1 / 2 →