WILLIAMS

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Borum v. United States, 409 F.2d 433 (D.C. Cir. 1967)
  …t. 1967, 18 L.Ed. 2d 1199 (1967). . See also the cases cited infra note 12. . See Kennedy v. United States, 122 U.S. App.D.C. 291, 293-296, 353 F. 2d 462, 464-467 (1965); Williams v. United States, 120 U.S.App.D.C. 244, 345 F. 2d 733, cert. denied 382 U.S. 962, 86 S.Ct. 444, 15 L.Ed.2d 364 (1965). . We note, however, that appellant makes no claim that the lineup procedure “was so unnecessarily suggestive and conducive to irreparable mistaken identification that he was denied due process of law,” Stovall…
• Wright v. United States, 404 F.2d 1256 (D.C. Cir. 1968)
  …s defensive theory, and communicated adequately the substance of his well taken position that he had no obligation to show that another was actually the transgressor. . See Williams v. United States, 120 U.S.App.D.C. 244, 345 F. 2d 733, cert. denied 382 U.S. 962, 86 S.Ct. 444, 15 L.Ed.2d 364 (1965); Kennedy v. United States, 122 U.S.App.D.C. 291, 293-296, 353 F. 2d 462, 464-467 (1965); Wise v. United States, 127 U.S.App.D.C. 279, 383 F. 2d 206, 209-210 (1967); Borum v. United States, No. 20,270 (D.C.Cir. De…
• United States v. Deaton, 364 F.2d 820 (6th Cir. 1966)
  …ed counsel whose competence is not attacked. And while counsel was not appointed prior to arraignment, we find no prejudice to appellant which arose from this fact. Williams v. United States, 120 U.S.App.D.C. 244, 345 F. 2d 733 (1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 962, 86 S.Ct. 444, 15 L.Ed.2d 364 (1965); United States v. Guerra, 334 F. 2d 138 (C.A. 2, 1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 936, 85 S.Ct. 337, 13 L.Ed.2d 346 (1964); Kimbro v. Heer, 364 F. 2d 116 (C.A. 6, 1966). Decided July 5, 1966. It is certainly true t…