ARMENTA

v.

DUNBAR, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR

Citator

Cited By

• Brest v. Ciccone, 371 F.2d 981 (8th Cir. 1967)
  …scretion of the Board in the denial of applications for parole, or to repass on the credibility of reports and informa [*983] tion received by the Board in making its determinations. Cagle v. Harris, 349 F. 2d 404, 405 (8th Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 965, 86 S.Ct. 455, 15 L.Ed.2d 369 (1965). Cf. Wright v. Settle, 293 F. 2d 317, 319 (8th Cir. 1961). By his petition appellant seeks a redetermination by the court of his eligibility for parole. The courts have no jurisdiction and no power to so review…
• Jones v. United States, 419 F.2d 593 (8th Cir. 1969)
  …e parole board need not grant him parole status merely because the time for his parole eligibility arrives. The granting of parole is discretionary with the board. 18 U.S.C. § 4203(a); Cagle v. Harris, 349 F. 2d 404, 405 (8 Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 965, 86 S.Ct. 455, 15 L.Ed.2d 369. This result makes it unnecessary for us to consider the secondary issue whether the district court could regard the reference in the original judgment to § 4208(a) as mere void material and sur-plusage, subject to bei…
• Scarpa v. U. S. Bd. OF Parole, 468 F.2d 31 (5th Cir. 1972)
  …w the discretion of the Board in the denial of applications for parole, or to repass on the credibility of reports and information received by the Board in making its determinations. Cagle v. Harris, 349 F. 2d 404, 405 (8th Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 965, 86 S.Ct. 455, 15 L.Ed.2d 369 (1965). Cf. Wright v. Settle, 293 F. 2d 317, 319 (8th Cir. 1961). By his petition appellant seeks a redetermination by the court by his eligibility for [*42] parole. The courts have no jurisdiction and no power to so r…