WILBUR POWELL, PETITIONER,
v.
RAY WILSON, SHERIFF OF OKALOOSA COUNTY, RESPONDENT

Fla. 1st DCA | 1966-09-01
No. I-158
WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., and SACK, J., concur.
190 So. 2d 31 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1966) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The Florida District Court of Appeal denied a petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed by an indigent inmate unable to pay his fine, holding that habeas corpus is not a substitute for a direct appeal or other post-conviction relief.


Holding

No, a writ of habeas corpus cannot be substituted for a direct appeal or other post-conviction relief proceedings.


Key Quotes

“Habeas Corpus cannot be substituted for a Criminal Procedure Rule 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix proceeding.”

Establishes the court's reasoning that habeas corpus is not a substitute for other legal remedies.

Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

The petitioner, Wilbur Powell, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, alleging he was a "poor" person unable to pay his fine and had not been r…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
JOPINSON, Judge.

JOPINSON, Judge.

This petition for writ of Habeas Corpus has attached to it a history of the case, signed by the petitioner, written in his own handwriting, presumably, and therefore, although not sworn to is presumed correct.

This petition for the Writ of Habeas Corpus is based primarily on the ground that petitioner is a “poor” person and un*32able to pay his fine. The petition alleges that petitioner “at no time has been represented by counsel,” but does not request counsel, nor allege that his rights have been violated as a result thereof.

Habeas Corpus cannot be substituted for a Criminal Procedure Rule 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix proceeding.

The allegations in the record before us are sufficient to warrant this court in denying the petition.

Petition denied.

WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., and SACK, J., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Harris v. Wainwright, 195 So. 2d 565 (Fla. 1966)
    …Certiorari denied without opinion. 190 So. 2d 31.…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw