LILLO ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES
LILLO ET AL.
UNITED STATES
382 U.S. 975
Supreme Court of the United States (1966)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Anne Windfohr Sowell v. Natural GAS Pipeline Co. OF Am., 789 F.2d 1151 (5th Cir. 1986)…eof.” Id. at 610 n.2. The GDO requires the lessor to give notice of and a reasonable time to remedy. Similarly, in Montana Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Shell Oil Co., 216 F.Supp. 214, 221 (D.Mont.1963), aff’d, 342 F. 2d 430 (9th Cir.1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 975, 86 S.Ct. 541, 15 L.Ed.2d 466 (1966) ("‘notice should express clearly the dereliction of which complaint is made’ ”), the letters claimed to be notice merely stated that an action to quiet title was being considered without indicating which clause h…