LITTELL
v.
NAKAI

U.S. | 1966-01-17
No. 355
382 U.S. 986 Supreme Court of the United States (1966) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …submitted to the arbitrator that he was faithful to his obligation and substantially followed the Supreme Court guidelines in Enterprise. Local 7-644, Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers v. Mobil Oil Co., 350 F. 2d 708, 711 (7th Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 986, 86 S.Ct. 563; 15 L.Ed.2d 474 (1966). In considering whether Kmiec was discharged “for cause, and if not, what remedy is appropriate,” (emphasis added) the arbitrator discussed the contentions of the Union and Campbell in relation to Company Rules…
    1 / 2
  • …is standard to mean that a reviewing court should not disturb the award so long as the interpretation was not arbitrary. Local 7-644, Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers Int’l Union, AFL-CIO v. Mobil Oil Co., 7 Cir., 350 F. 2d 708 (1965), cert, denied, 382 U.S. 986, 86 S. Ct. 563, 15 L.Ed.2d 474 (1966). Hence, we recognize that our review is severely circumscribed. “ARTICLE XIV — Termination Section 1. It is agreed that this agreement shall be effective as of the 1st day of January 1964, and shall thereafter…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw