HAZELTINE RESEARCH, INC., ET AL.

v.

BRENNER, COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS; MCMASTER V. UNITED STATES; WOLFF V. UNITED STATES; BULLOCK V. VIRGINIA; LAURITZEN V. SPANN; JOHNSON V. UNITED STATES; MAXWELL V. STEPHENS, PENITENTIARY SUPERINTENDENT; GISH V. MISSOURI; ALBANESE V. N. V. NEDERL. AMERIK STOOMV. MAATS. ET AL.; BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST & SAVINGS ASSOCIATION V. UNITED STATES; PREZIOSO V. UNITED STATES; CHATSWORTH COOPERATIVE MARKETING ASSOCIATION ET AL. V. INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION; ATLANTIC REFINING CO. V. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION; BRASCH V. STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND ET AL.; MORAN V. PENAN ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Peterson, 524 F.2d 167 (4th Cir. 1975)
  …would have concluded the search valid as to Stanley Peterson. We find particularly persuasive in arriving at that result Maxwell v. Stephens (8th Cir. 1965) 348 F. 2d 325, cert. denied, 382 U.S. 944, 86 S.Ct. 387, 15 L.Ed.2d 353 (1965), reh. denied, 382 U.S. 1000, 86 S.Ct. 532, 15 L.Ed.2d 490 (1965). There, Mr. Justice (then Circuit Judge) Black-mun, upholding the right of a mother to consent to a search of a room in the home shared, as here, by the defendant with his two younger brothers, said (pp. 336-37):…
• Deffes v. Fed. Barge Lines, Inc., 361 F.2d 422 (5th Cir. 1966)
  …been espoused by the Ninth Circuit in Huff v. Matson Navigation Co., 9th Cir. 1964, 338 F. 2d 205, cert. denied, 380 U.S. 943, 85 S.Ct. 1026, 13 L.Ed.2d 963 and by the Third Circuit in Spann v. Lauritzen, 3rd Cir. 1965, 344 F. 2d 204, cert. denied, 382 U.S. 1000, 15 L.Ed.2d 489. After carefully considering these cases and the Supreme Court cases which have developed the doctrine of unseaworthiness, we conclude that the decisions of the Ninth and Third Circuits correctly state the law and that, therefore, th…
• Nita B. Pogue v. Int'l Indus., Inc., 524 F.2d 342 (6th Cir. 1975)
  …e a consignment device was employed, but prohibited it where there was a resale method of distribution. See, also, Atlantic Refining Co. v. F.T.C., 344 F. 2d 599 (6th Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 939, 86 S.Ct. 391, 15 L.Ed.2d 350, reh. denied, 382 U.S. 1000, 86 S.Ct. 535, 15 L.Ed.2d 490. The facts of this case differ significantly from Simpson and Atlantic. In this case Mrs. Pogue was actually an agent. Dominion and control remained with the House of Nine primarily so that high quality and business go…