CALHOUN
v.
PATE, WARDEN; HUGHES ET AL. V. KROPP, WARDEN; BARNARD V. UNITED STATES; BRYE V. WAINWRIGHT, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR; LASSITER V. UNITED STATES; KNIPPEL V. UNITED STATES; MASSARI V. UNITED STATES; EDELL V. DI PIAZZA ET AL.; GADSDEN ET AL. V. FRIPP ET AL.; ATKINS V. KANSAS; BECKER V. MATTEAWAN STATE HOSPITAL SUPERINTENDENT ET AL.; CORCORAN V. YORTY ET AL.; MOODY V. UNITED MINE WORKERS LOCAL FOR THE UNITED STATES ET AL.

U.S. | 1966-01-17
Nos. 125; No. 219; No. 310; No. 320; No. 345; No. 346; No. 592; No. 602; No. 617; No. 637; No. 674; No. 801; No. 852
382 U.S. 1002 Supreme Court of the United States (1966) Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • United States v. Erwin Edward Ballard, 423 F.2d 127 (5th Cir. 1970)
    …uggestive, Bryan’s admission would have effectively waived the point. . 360 U.S. 264, 79 S.Ct. 1173, 3 L.Ed.2d 217 (1959). . 360 U.S. at 270. . 342 F. 2d 309 (9th Cir. 1965); cert. den. 382 U.S. 948, 86 S.Ct. 403, 15 L.Ed.2d 356 (1965); reh. den. 382 U.S. 1002, 86 S.Ct. 567, 15 L.Ed.2d 491 (1966). . 342 F. 2d at 320. . 419 F. 2d 91 (5th Cir. 1969) 3, 1969]. . Id. at p. 93.…
  • United States v. Gleeson, 411 F.2d 1091 (10th Cir. 1969)
    …946 (10th Cir. 1962). . 391 U.S. 123, 88 S.Ct. 1620, 20 L.Ed.2d 476 (1968). . 295 F. 2d 418 (10th Cir. 1961). . Barnard v. United States, 342 F. 2d 309 (9th Cir.) cert. denied, 382 U.S. 94S, 86 S.Ct. 403, 15 L.Ed.2d 356 (1965), rehearing denied, 382 U.S. 1002, 86 S.Ct. 567, 15 B.Ed.2d 491 (1966); United States v. Mills, 366 F. 2d 512 (6tli Cir. 1966). . Ayasli v. United States, 352 F. 2d 1009, 1010 (10th Cir. 1965).…
  • Batsell v. United States, 403 F.2d 395 (8th Cir. 1968)
    …nited States v. Mills, 6 Cir., 1966, 366 F. 2d 512; United States v. Roviaro, 7 Cir., 1967, 379 F. 2d 911; Barnard v. United States, 9 Cir., 1965, 342 F. 2d 309, cert. denied, 1965, 382 U.S. 948, 86 S.Ct. 403, 15 L.Ed.2d 356, rehearing denied, 1966, 382 U.S. 1002, 86 S.Ct. 567, 15 L.Ed.2d 491. Here, the limiting of counsel to one hour of argument on each side was not, in our opinion, an abuse of discretion. In granting additional time thereafter, the court exercised substantial liberality with defense counse…

Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw