KATZENBACH, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL.

v.

MORGAN ET UX.; AND NEW YORK CITY BOARD OF ELECTIONS V. MORGAN ET UX.

Citator

Cited By

• South Carolina v. Katzenbach, 383 U.S. 301 (U.S. 1966)
  …er, 236 F. Supp. 511; United States v. Palmer, 230 F. Supp. 716. For convenient reference, the entire Act is reprinted in an Appendix to this opinion. Section 4 (e) has been challenged in Morgan v. Katzenbach, 247 F. Supp. 196, prob. juris, noted, 382 U. S. 1007, and in United States v. County Bd. of Elections, 248 F. Supp. 316. Section 10 (a)(c) is involved in United States v. Texas, 252 F. Supp. 234, and in United States v. Alabama, 252 F. Supp. 95; see also Harper v. Virginia State Bd. of Elections, No.…
• Katzenbach v. Morgan et ux., 384 U.S. 641 (U.S. 1966)
  …wers granted to it by the Constitution and therefore usurped powers reserved to the States by the Tenth Amendment. 247 F. Supp. 196. Appeals were taken directly to this Court, 28 U. S. C. §§ 1252, 1253 (1964 ed.), and we noted probable jurisdiction. 382 U. S. 1007. We reverse. We hold that, in the application challenged in these cases, § 4 (e) is a proper exercise of the powers granted to Congress by § 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment5 and that by force of the [*647] Supremacy Clause, Article VI, the New York En…
• Rinaldi v. Yeager, 384 U.S. 305 (U.S. 1966)
  …n v. Illinois, 351 U. S. 12. Rinaldi brought this suit to enjoin enforcement of the statute on the ground that it is uncon [*307] stitutional.2 A three-judge Federal District Court denied relief, 238 F. Supp. 960, and we noted probable jurisdiction, 382 U. S. 1007. The statute in question is N. J. Stat. Ann. § 2A: 152-18 (1964 Cum. Supp.), and it provides as follows: “The county treasurer shall file a notice of [the payment by the county] and the amount thereof with the institution in which said person, upo…