SCOTT

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Keener v. Ridenour, 594 F.2d 581 (6th Cir. 1979)
  …it is available, is the exclusive means by which a prisoner may collaterally attack his conviction in State court. Noble v. McMaken, 45 Ohio St.2d 236, 344 N.E. 2d 129 (1976); Freeman v. Maxwell, 4 Ohio St.2d 4, 210 N.E. 2d 885 (1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 1017, 86 S.Ct. 634, 15 L.Ed.2d 532 (1966). For a complete discussion of the history of § 2953.21 as the sole method of collaterally attacking a criminal conviction, see Knox v. Maxwell, 277 F.Supp. 593, 596-99 (N.D.Ohio 1967). See also 26 Ohio Jur.2d, Ha…
• Moore v. Smith, 412 F.2d 720 (7th Cir. 1969)
  …e no reason or intervening change in the law requiring us to depart therefrom. See Weathers v. Willingham, 356 F. 2d 421 (10th Cir. 1966); O’Callahan v. Attorney General of United States, 351 F. 2d 43 (1st Cir. 1965) (per curiam), certiorari denied, 382 U.S. 1017, 86 S.Ct. 632, 15 L.Ed.2d 531. Affirmed. . Apparently because of an ambiguous assertion on p. 3 of the habeas corpus petition, the district court found that petitioner first learned of the existence of the warrant “in February of 1968.” . 18 U.S.…
• Canavari v. Richardson, 419 F.2d 1287 (9th Cir. 1969)
  …nce of his prison sentence. Had he not violated the conditions it would have done so. The Constitution does not require that he have it both ways.” Affirmed. . First Circuit: O’Callahan v. Attorney General, 351 F. 2d 43 at 44 (1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 1017, 86 S.Ct. 632, 15 L.Ed.2d 531 Fourth Circuit: O’Neal v. Fleming, 201 F. 2d 665 (1953) Hall v. Welch, 185 F. 2d 525 (1950) Fifth Circuit: Clark v. Blackwell, 374 F. 2d 952 (1967) Van Horn v. Maguire, 328 F. 2d 585 (1964) Seventh Circuit: Hodge v…